The Role Of Power In The Kite Runner, By Khaled Hosseini

Within every person, there exists some type of power, but it is the way one uses it that defines if they are good or evil. Power is always unpredictable, it captivates the worst and corrupts the best. In rough times people need leaders to look up to, a voice to guide them and actions to be taken. This leader can either abuse or use the power correctly. For example, in Afghanistan in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the political conflicts caused many people to flee, but some brave individuals stood around to take over the violent and oppressive rulers. This power isn’t just used in political complications but it is also expressed in social life. It is used in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Usually, one half feels as though they†¦show more content†¦He always makes sure to use his money for the poor in Kabul and not for selfish reasons. Baba even made the decision â€Å"to build an orphanage† for all the parentless kids in the capital (Hosseini 13). H is wealth, Pashtun ethnicity, and gender make him almost God like. All of these characteristics make his good deeds seem that much stronger. Although he has all this economic, gender and cultural power he never loses his right mindfulness, believing that stealing is the biggest sin of them all. Presuming that When you kill a man, you steal a life, Baba said. You steal his wifes right to a husband, rob his children of a father. When you tell a lie, you steal someones right to the truth. When you cheat, you steal the right to fairness (Hosseini 18). He also believes in standing up for people, such as the moment when he stands up to the Russian soldier and almost takes a bullet for a woman who he does not know in order for her not to get violently raped. Research shows that political and social power is not corrupting but freeing to a human being, it gives them confidence and a voice to act on (Resnick). It also turns out â€Å"that power does not always lead to bad behavior and can actually make leaders more sensitive to the needs of others†(Hutson). Power can put things in order, without a leader or someone in a higher rank, no one would know who to blame for problems or who to receive answers from. Although all of this evidence portrays how power is usedShow MoreRelatedThe Kite Runner and King Lear Comparative Essay957 Words   |  4 PagesThe Kite Runner and King Lear Comparative Essay Families play a large role in our world. Sometimes families keep you together but at other times they can tear you apart. The subject of family is a major theme in Khaled Hosseinis extraordinary novel, The Kite Runner and Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, King Lear. In both of these writings, family is a constant theme that occurs throughout both works of literature. Family relationship is often expressed through the actions of the characters andRead MoreEssay on A Womans Place: The Kite Runner934 Words   |  4 PagesThroughout Khaled Hosseini’s novel, The Kite Runner, the reader observes many injustices committed due to the presence of the Taliban and cultural conflict in Afghanistan. One of the most concerning issues in Afghanistan is the mistreatment and inequality that women face on a daily basis due to Taliban mandates. Women in Afghanistan are treated as inferior beings to men and are unable to stand up for themselves due the laws the Taliban enforces. Hosseini uses the wives of Amir and Hassan, SorayaRead MoreEssay The Kite Runner and To Kill a Mockingbird Comparison1010 Words   |  5 PagesIn both The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini and To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, literacy and education play a key role. The education of a man gives him power, and can determine his stature or influence in the community. Literacy gives a man an insight to knowledge that can be important. By developing characters with different levels of education, Khaled Hosseini and Harper Lee develop and strengthen the idea that literacy and education are dangerous tools, and can make the difference betweenRead MoreKhaled Hosseini s The Kite Runner1679 Words   |  7 Pages Khaled Hosseini was born in Kabul, Afghanistan, on March 4th 1965. Hosseini s homeland was the inspiration for his novel, The Kite Runner, which gave his readers a taste of what Afghanistan was before the brutal invasions of the Taliban. He spent his early childhood living in Tehran, Iran, where he befriended his family s cook. The unexpected friendship between a young Afghan and a member of the Hazara ethnic group exposed Hosseini to the acts of injustice against minority groups in AfghanistanRead MoreInfluences on Social Mobility in The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini875 Words   |  4 PagesThe Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini Amir lives in a nice home in Kabul, Afghanistan, with his father. They have two servants, Ali and his son, Hassan. Ali and Hassan are Hazaras, which is an ethnic minority. Hassan is often teased and harassed by a group of boys, one in particular named Assef, who wishes to get rid of all Hazaras in the future. One day an incident happens between Hassan and Assef that changes Amir’s relationship with Hassan forever, bringing Amir to ultimately cause Ali andRead MoreThe Kite Runner By Khaled Hosseini1530 Words   |  7 Pagesthey will find their answer. In the novel â€Å"The Kite Runner†, Khaled Hosseini uses the symb ols of the kites, literature, and the scars to show that Amir must overcome his cowardice and selfishness to achieve maturity and redemption. Hosseini uses the kites as a symbol throughout the novel to show Amir’s path to redemption and maturity from his cowardice and selfish acts through kite fighting, the tournament, and running the kite for Sohrab. Kite fighting is a well known tradition in AfghanistanRead MoreThe Kite Runner: Forgiveness, Loyalty, and the Quest for Redemption2381 Words   |  10 PagesThe Kite Runner: Forgiveness, Loyalty, and the Quest for Redemption Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner is an award-winning novel and considered one of today’s most popular, contemporary classics. The story is one of familiar themes such as loyalty, forgiveness, betrayal, love, and redemption. It follows the tale of Amir and how he must atone for his sins and find a way to â€Å"be good again† (Hosseini 2). The quintessential message of this book relies on the idea of second chances. Themes of redemptionRead MoreThe Kite Runner By Khaled Hosseini3402 Words   |  14 Pagestitle â€Å"The Kite Runner† is symbolic as fighting kites and the kite runnings are impacting moments in the novel. Hassan was the best kite runner in Kabul, if not the whole country, after Amir won the kite fighting the running of that last blue kite triggered the monumental changes for Amir. For the beginning of the story the kite running was associated with Hassan’s rape and Amir’s grief. As kites appear throughout the story, they begin Amir’s story and also end it. Amir flying the kite with SohrabRead MoreEssay about The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini993 Words   |  4 Pagesand actions taken by the sons. Perhaps, the overbearing testosterone levels claim responsibility for the apparent need for sons to impress their fathers, but not all boys consider the realistic consequences of their decisions. In Khaled Hosseinis novel The Kite Runner, young Amirs admiration for his father Baba, coupled with the constant tension in their relationship obscures his mind from making clear decisions as he strives to obtain his fathers love and approval. Amir and his father shareRead MoreThe Kite Runner and the Caste System Essay1844 Words   |  8 Pagesclasses and plays an important role throughout the Kite Runner. The book sates that there needs to be an order of the people to make sense of things worthwhile. The two boys try to defy that the caste system is nothing more than a state of mind. The Afghan people feel alienated from their own history because of the caste system. Kite fighting is a perfect example of the caste system. One has the fighter who attacks other kites, and the runner who chases he fallen kites. Hassan who is a Shia while

Symbolism in The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson Essay

The Lottery: Symbolism In her story â€Å"The Lottery†, Shirley Jackson manages to catch the readers’ attention and ultimately shock them with an unexpected ending; all of which help her emphasize her critique toward the dark side of human nature and the evil that resides, sometimes, in those who we less expect it from. Jackson uses symbolism throughout the story that helps her set the mood and also makes the readers wonder and analyze the senseless violence and cruelty in their own lives. It all starts with the setting of the story. As Jackson describes â€Å"the morning of June 27th was clear and sunny, with the fresh warmth of a full-summer day; the flowers were blossoming profusely and the grass was richly green†. It seems to introduce a†¦show more content†¦The symbolism behind the stones is clear; they are not only murder weapons, but the first tools ever made by men were made of stone, which denote the savage and violent customs of ancestors. The author also uses symbolism through the name of the characters. For example, Mr. Summers; the name â€Å"Summers† suggests that he is a cheerful man and to support this, he is described as a â€Å"round-faced, jovial man† with â€Å"time and energy to devote to civic activities† ; however, the true personality lying behind the name is the total opposite. On the other hand, the name Graves is the most obvious of all, the name relates to the place where corpses are buried, a strong indication of the participation of death in the story. Other symbolic elements that Jackson used were her characters. One of the main is Old Man Warner who embodies tradition and the refusal to change old customs. On the other hand, the feminine roles symbolize the patriarchal nature of the traditional values of society ; in the text the woman’s place was the home, as merely housewives, this is implied in the fact that they were â€Å"wearing faded house dresses and sweaters†. The participation of children is quite sinister; it symbolizes how insensitive a society becomes after being exposed to violence for such a long time, even the most innocent members. Mr. Graves helping Davy Hutchinson selectShow MoreRelatedSymbolism In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson869 Words   |  4 PagesSymbolism is used throughout The Lottery in the character names. Author, Shirley Jackson, uses the name of, Mr. Graves, to foreshadow the story and explain what â€Å"The Lottery† really is. Mr. Graves is the one who carries the three-legged stool which could indicate two things: the Trinity, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, or it could mean the past, present and future, saying that â€Å"The Lottery† will always be among the people of the village. In addition, he is also the owner of the post office andRead MoreSymbolism Of The Lottery By Shirley Jackson926 Words   |  4 PagesWhen incorporated well, symbolism enhances a story’s overall impact. Shirley Ja ckson’s short story â€Å"The Lottery† contains symbolism to affect the readers’ feelings as well as add interest. The story begins with the villagers gathering at the square to participate in the lottery. The villagers chat while waiting for the event to begin. After Mr. Summers comes with a black box, he stirs the pieces of paper in the box. The narrators describe the lottery as an old ritual that the community continuesRead MoreSymbolism Of The Lottery By Shirley Jackson1577 Words   |  7 PagesShirley Jackson s The Lottery , is a story that is filled with symbolism. The author uses symbolism to help her represent human nature as tainted, no matter how pure one thinks of himself or herself, or how pure their environment may seem to be. The story is very effective in raising many questions about the pointless nature of humanity regarding tradition and violence. The Lottery clearly expresses Jackson s feelings concerning mankind?s evil nature hiding behind traditions and ritualsRead MoreSymbolism In The Lottery By Shirley Jackson879 Words   |  4 PagesShirley Jackson, the author of the short story â€Å"The Lottery† is an unusual story of a town caught in a trap of following tradition. Shirley Jackson uses many symbols in the story to relate to the theme. By doing this it helps the reader understand the story and the message she is trying to get across. Jackson uses tone, setting, and symbolism to conduct a theme for her readers. By doing this she creates connections to the theme by using the black box and old man Warner as a symbol. Old man WarnerRead MoreUse of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson1146 Words   |  5 Pageswhat is known as Symbolism. Symbolism is the use of object, name, or person to represent an idea. If a name is being use, a name such as autumn can represent the adulthood of a human. Creatures such as an Eagle, represents ‘Freedom’ and ‘America’. Even inanimate objects can represent ideas; the light bulb represents ideas that just sparked into a character’s head. In the short story, â€Å"The Lottery† by Shirley Jackson, a village has just entered the month of June, meaning that the lottery is to begin.Read MoreUse of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson954 Words   |  4 PagesSymbolism means like any place, person or thing that is something but can be interpreted in a different way. The Lottery by Shirley Jackson is a short story that shows symbolism, to give hints about the story in all the characters and objects in the story. This Short story takes place in the summer where a small town has a lottery every year round. The person that wins the lottery has a huge impact on the town and the crops that grow in it. Old man Warner is the oldest in the town andRead More, Symbolism, And Themes In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson1252 Words   |  6 PagesShirley Jackson’s The Lottery, is a realism story that was written for the main purpose of entertainment. Jackson writes about a small village that gathers every year for an event they call â€Å"The Lottery†. Every head of households comes up and draws a slip of paper from the box. Bill Hutchinson draws the first slip of paper with the black dot but Tessie Hutchinson quickly exclaims the lottery is not fair. Mr. Summers then puts five slips of paper back into the box, one for each of the family membersRead MoreTheme Of Symbolism In The Lottery By Shirley Jackson960 Words   |  4 Pagesagainst it shall be purged with death. The beauty of this world is just a mere mask to hide its monstrosity.Tear off its mask and you shall be bestowed upon the gift of the cruelty of this world. Shirley Jackson’s short story the â€Å"Lottery† illustrates the characte r Tessie Hutchinson as a figure of symbolism as it leads to the theme that the norms of society isolates those who are a victim of labels and expectations because they decorate the origins of sins therefore premonition of the ruin to someRead MoreSymbolism in The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson Essay example1173 Words   |  5 PagesWhen most people play the lottery today, they think about having wealth. Generally, people who win are happy about it whether they win one dollar or a million. The lottery in our society has grown to support education and it is often worth several million dollars. Usually, the winner of the lottery gains a lot of recognition for the money they win. But what would happen if there was a small town where people held a yearly lottery in which the â€Å"winner† was the member of the town who was not sacrificedRead More The Use of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson Essay938 Words   |  4 PagesThe Use of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jacks on Within the first few lines of Shirley Jacksons The Lottery we are faced with such adjectives as clear, sunny, fresh and warmth. She goes on to paint a picture of small children just out of school for the summer, as the townspeople gather for the annual Lottery. This leads us to believe that the rest of the story is as cheery as the summer day initially described. We as the readers are virtually unaware of the horrible senseless events

Marxism Free Essays

The United States prides itself on being the epitome of a successful free market society, with its democratic ideals working in perfect conjunction with its capitalist economy.   Additionally, it also bases much of its existence on the freedom of religion, though government leaders still take many measures to ensure that their particular religious beliefs take precedence over secularism.   However, like few other countries on the planet, the U. We will write a custom essay sample on Marxism or any similar topic only for you Order Now S. could succeed as a communist nation if it were to adopt a few of Karl Marx’s simple precepts and abandon some of its current practices. With its increasingly secular population and views, as well as its democratic ideals that lend themselves well to the collectivization encouraged by communism, the United States could completely remove God from consideration in the country’s legislation and create a strong social welfare system that protects workers and the poor far better than current standards allow. While religion is firmly protected in the Constitution, the freedom from religion is just as important, though often ignored.   Politicians often rely on their religious beliefs and voting populace to propose religiously-oriented legislation, most of the time despite the widespread secular ideals of most Americans.   A current example of this is stem cell research, which is firmly opposed by President Bush and many religious factions and politicians who foist their views of morality on the rest of the country that believes stem cell research is in the best interests of human progress. While morality has its place in society, reason can lead to just laws that most can agree upon, and religious sentiment should not be involved in legislation or its opposition whatsoever.   For Marx, religion is a type of illusion, used to control the populace, as well as to retain the power structure of those at the highest levels of society.   In America, this can be seen in the powerful sway that religious factions have on politicians, even in spite of an increasing secularization. Marx was a fervent supporter of social criticism, and he believed that the criticism of religion was foundation of all social criticism.   In his view, he found it to be a type of illusion.   Marx believed that man makes religion, not vice-versa, and in creating God in his own image, man had â€Å"alienated himself from himself† (Marx, 1978/1848, p. 53).   This means that man has created a greater being in contrast to himself, reducing himself to a despicable creature that needs both the dogma of the church and the laws of government to guide and control him. Marx described religion as the, â€Å"sigh of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, the soul of soulless conditions,† adding that religion was â€Å"the opium of the people† (1978/1848, p. 54).   In the United States, religion is afforded all kinds of special protections, including tax breaks that surely cost the country billions of dollars a year.   Religious institutions receive donations from their constituents and are not required to pay anything to the federal government. In a Marxist America, provided that religion is still protected by law, the first step would be to tax religious organizations as any other company.   Perhaps once religions are taxed the same as any other organization that makes money and owns property, the next natural step will be that they no longer have the power sustain themselves and people will be free to pursue a life free of religion, and therefore free of illusion. To Marx, religion prohibits man from realizing himself as the center of his existence, an in place, creates an environment in which religious belief dictates his action.   Men can never be free, as long as they accept their existence as subservient beings, indebted to an omnipotent Supreme Being or organization dedicated to perpetuating belief in such a thing.   Marx believed that if religion were abolished human beings would overcome their self-inflicted alienation.   The abandonment of this illusion, in Marx’s view, could be one of many crucial steps mankind towards advancement. After religious sentiment and the power the religious factions hold over the populace has been displaced, America will be more receptive to other aspects of Marx’s communist philosophy.   While it may be a difficult task to ask those with great wealth and influence to sacrifice either, including corporations that virtually run the country, but it is necessary to create the kind of equality promised by democracy, and guaranteed by communism and withheld by the inequality of capitalism.   Marx claimed that in a capitalist society the struggle between the working class, or proletariat, and the ruling business class, or bourgeoisie, would eventually end in the formation of a new society, a classless society: â€Å"Society can no longer live under this bourgoeisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society† (1978/1848, p. 483). Corporations and individuals with immense wealth would be required to sacrifice a significant portion of their wealth to contribute to the overall health of the proletariat.   Even if someone like Bill Gates was required to hand over ninety percent of his wealth, he would still have hundreds of millions of dollars left.   When one considers that a salary of fifty thousand dollars a year is considered not only adequate to live in the United States, but decent, it signifies that the disparity in wealth created by unchecked capitalism.   The situation created by the immense disparity of wealth also contributes to what Marx sees as an increased alienation between the people of the nation, and in the U.S., this situation has become apparent in recent years as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. This contributes to the classes become hostile towards each other in Marx’s estimation: â€Å"Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes† (1978/1848, p. 483).   Though class struggle in America has largely been relegated to race struggle, which is almost the same considering that most racial riots center around impoverished people looting, the potential exists for further complications if the wealthy in America are not willing to compromise and share the wealth.   Alienation even exists in America between men and women, where women are notorious for making significantly less money than men.   In a communist society, women would no longer be relegate d to quasi-second class status. A communist America would not only provide more opportunities for workers, but would also help relations between different races and genders.   Amongst the many little-known facts about the philosophies of Karl Marx, was his support for women’s liberation in a time when they did not share the privileges of men.   He believed that this would encourage greater equality within societies, therefore making life better for the society as a whole.   More than a century ago, many years before women were allowed to vote in the United States, Marx wrote of his views towards women’s rights. In the modern bourgeoisie society, Marx explained in so many words, that women in a capitalist system were nothing more to men than another instrument of production.   Men, who controlled the world as wells as it’s productive forces, also controlled women.   Because the instruments of production are to be exploited, women are exploited.   With the abolition of the bourgeoisie society, women would be free from every form of prostitution, public or private.   For the Communists, there was, â€Å"no need to introduce community of women; it has always existed almost from time immemorial† (1978/1848, p. 488). But traditional capitalistic values make this fact all but impossible to notice, and in the United States, the quiet discrimination against women, largely inspired by the centuries of dogmatic religious misogyny, would be eliminated, and along with it, the alienation felt between people.   Otherwise, further alienation between people will take place. Marx applied this idea of alienation to private property, which he said causes humans to work only for themselves, not for the good of their species.   Because capitalism has its roots in private ownership, he felt that it created an environment, ripe for greed and avarice to develop: â€Å"The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property† (1978/1848, p. 483).   Ã‚  The control imposed upon the proletariat by the bourgeoisie in the United States reflects many of Marx’s fears, as people fall under the sway of Walmart, utility monopolies, and media confusion.   This state prevents man from focusing on cooperating, and maximizing their potential, whereas a Marxist society would be one that would provide for all. A communist United States is a highly unlike, but possible if certain segments of the population are willing to listen to reason and make certain sacrifices.   Religion is a key in building the foundation for a communist society, as the religious organizations that enjoy tax protection must be treated equal to other companies.   Corporations and individuals must be willing to make sacrifices concerning individual income and pay a significant amount of taxes to help those less fortunate. After all, it makes little sense to keep one’s neighbors hungry.   And, though communism has been considered revolutionary for over a hundred years, a communist revolution in America can begin only with the conscientious objections of the working class.   Anyone with ample reason would be able to see the benefits of helping their fellow man, and the benefits of pooling the nation’s collective talents towards a common goal.   In the end, it relies on those that are currently oppressed to make their voice be heard and heed the clarion call of Karl Marx: â€Å"WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!† (1978/1848, p. 500). Works Cited: Marx, K. (1978/1848). Communist Manifesto. The Marx-Engels Reader. Trans. Tucker, R. C., Second Edition. New York: W. W. Norton. How to cite Marxism, Essay examples

Erics response to the tragedy Essay Example For Students

Erics response to the tragedy Essay The character of Gerald helps Priestly explore social issues by showing how playing with Evas emotions by entering into a romantic relationship can also be abusing social responsibility because relationships themselves carry responsibility, which is increased when one of the people involved is in a very vulnerable position and also of lower class. He gave her unrealistic hopes. But his first intentions were decent, but eventually he admits that the feelings she had for him were stronger than those he felt back. When he finally leaves her he feels immense guilt as he can only offer her temporary help and support. The feeling that I think Priestly wants us to have is that of sympathy for Gerald because Daisy told me shed been happier than shed ever been before. Although he appears to have a deep feel of regret towards the way he used Eva and his actions where indisputable, his response to the inspectors message does not have the same degree of depth that Sheila shows. It is worth to keep in mind that when the inspector leaves, to distract everyone from his or her own implication Gerald is the first to inquire into whether this man was an impostor.  Geralds views are similar to those of Mr.Birlings; he shows support to him when Mr.Birling tries to justify his reasons for sacking Eva. Mrs Birling is someone who is dedicated to helping women; she has therefore put herself in his position of social responsibility. She appears ignorant and prejudice throughout the course of the play. She makes snobbish remarks such as a girl of that sort and believing that she has absolutely no part in all of this makes snide comments about the way her family attempt to settle the matter of Evas death. She remains determined that Evas death could be, in any way shape or form, her fault. In act II she even refuses to recognise a photo shown to her by the inspector no, why should I? After being put under severe pressure by the Inspector, Mrs.Birling finally admits her disregard and neglect for the pregnant girl, yet still manages to force the blame onto the unborn childs father if anyones to blame its the young man unbeknownst to her that this young man that she piles the blame onto will reveal to be her own son. The audience are now able to see that the chain of events could have easily resulted in the Eva Smiths suicide. Her aim is to always reflect the image of respectability and this is what she puts before her responsibility as a person to help others that come to her charity. Priestly uses this character because she has a strong personality and will have an immediate reaction on the audience or reader of this play, it helps him to explore how prejudice some people can be after the use of their name or something else that is equally petty is miss- used!  Erics response to the tragedy is similar to that of Sheila, his immediate reaction seems to be Oh, God they both show sympathy for the way she was sacked by their father. But near to the end of the book, whilst some people have already figured out that Eric is the father of Evas unborn baby, we are told of his abuse of social status and male superiority. He exemplifies irresponsibility whilst under the influence of alcohol takes advantage of Evas vulnerability. Unlike Gerald, Eric does offer marriage to Eva, but as she is aware that he does not love her she refuses. Eric does give her money for support but when Eva realises it was stolen from his father, she will not accept any more from him. I think that Priestly made the most responsible people for the death of Eva Smith, the older generation. This may have been because they are generally speaking more set in their ways unlike people such as Eric and Sheila. Ultimately I think that Priestly used each of the characters to portray a different part of society and personified them to the death of Eva Smith.  I believe that Priestly made the character of Mr.Birling hold the most social and moral responsibilities. His unwillingness to accept these shows his insolence. In the Tragedy of Macbeth by William Shakespeare, one of more interesting theories is the theory of kingship EssayThe mystery element helps to add curiosity to the play therefore keeping the audience attentive. It plays a very strong part in Priestly trying to get the audience to realise their social responsibilities. I say this because, towards the end of the story the issue becomes not whether they all affected the same girl, or whether the name inspector Goole actually existed. But through all this mystery these points become irrelevant and emphasize the fact that the real issue is all of these people have affected someones life in such a negative way. The mysteries begin after the inspector leaves the family home. This is when each person feels at the most tension that they have all felt through the play. It is as if after he leaves they need something to distract them from the thought of being irresponsible in their actions. So they begin to ask themselves questions such as was he a real inspector? And Did he show us all the same photo? This brings the tension down. The thought of them being tricked by a hoax makes them concentrate on this matter instead of the thought of how terrible the death of Eva is and the way that they all acted towards her. The climatic pattern of action is a very important dramatic quality of this play. It is a combination of the building up of tension starting from the entrance of the Inspector and the way he asks questions and interrogates each member of the family. The way in which he does question the family has a distinctive style it is as though he is putting ideas into there heads or suggesting the way that they might have affected her in fact in a kind of way you might be said to have been jealous of her here he is slowly getting Sheila to admit that she did feel jealous of Eva. He appears very sly throughout the play, this helps us build a picture of his character in our minds Sheila- But mother do stop before its too late- Mrs.Birling- if you mean that the inspector will take offence- Inspector No no I never take offence. Here he wishes for Mrs.Birling to carry on because he knows that she is digging herself in to a deep hole that she will not be able to get back out of, this is exactly the position that the inspector wants to get her into. As she gets herself into this position the tension among those on stage does build up dramatically and this has an affect on the audience, it makes them aware of how she treated the girl badly and refused to take the blame. They should therefore think afterwards only negative thoughts about Mrs.Birling and of course the rest of the family and want to change their own ways of treating and respecting people of a lower class. This is exactly what I think J.B Priestly wanted the audience of the play to reflect on, after leaving the theatre. As the play progresses, the inspector manages to make each person admit there wrong doing and tell him the story of how they were involved with Eva Smith. He never actually tells them much about Eva Smith, but it is clear to us that he does however know more than he is letting on. It is clear that right at the end of Act II he know that Eric was the father of Evas unborn child. I am waiting Mrs.Birling Waiting for what Inspector To do my duty here we are hinted that he is waiting for Eric to return back to the house, so that he may ask him questions about the death of Eva, shortly afterward Mrs.Birling realises that what he is trying to tell he is that Eric may well be the father. This is confirmed after the inspector interrogates Eric and as he has done so in the last four cases, gets him to explain everything.